|
This
is still a work in progress.
Here's a 9/11
time line that will surprise you. It begins with a letter to the editor published in the New
York Times of 30 April 2001:
'67 Attack on the Liberty To the Editor: Re
"Book Says Israel Intended 1967 Attack on U.S. Ship" (news article, April 23): James Bamford's book "Body
of Secrets" indicates that the attack on the United States intelligence ship Liberty by Israel in 1967 was intended. I
researched this matter for 13 years. I analyzed 10 official United States investigations of the incident by the Central
Intelligence Agency, the United States Navy, the President's Foreign Intelligence Board, the Department of Defense and
the National Security Agency, plus five Congressional investigations. They all came to the same conclusion, as did three
official Israeli investigations: The attack was a tragic mistake, or there is no evidence that it was intentional. A.
Jay Cristol Miami, April 23, 200 The writer is a federal judge in the Southern District of Florida. Not wanting to let this fraud pass unchallenged, I filed a
complaint of judicial misconduct against Cristol, as shown below (8 pages): Click
here for easier to read copies of the following five pages. The decision of the Chief Judge was swift, nitpicking as to the relativity of my misuse of the
term "color of the law" and fully abstentious on the heavier matters of my complaint. (See next two pages.)
I therefore exercised my prerogative to petition the Judicial Council for review of the Chief Judge's
dismissal of my complaint as "frivolous." Click here for easier to read copy of text. The
Court received and accepted my petition. At
this time I also phoned a request to Judge Cristol for a copy of his original letter of 23 April 2001 to the Editor of the
New York Times. Such a simple request left with his assistant who answered the
phone resulted in this rather convoluted response.  Based on previous experience in petitioning the judicial councils
of the 2nd and 7th circuits for review of chief appellate judges' decisions in 1993, I expected a swift reply from this
Judicial Council of the 11th Circuit in Atlanta. But by 20 July, nearly three full weeks after properly submitting my petition,
I began to hope that the Judicial Council would exercise its prerogative to launch its own investigation or even introduce
the matter to the highest level, the Judicial Conference, which meets once a year with the Chief Justice of the US Supreme
Court presiding. Just as my hopes were kindled
by the Judicial Council's delayed response, I also realized that Judge Cristol must have been a bit apprehensive about
what might be happening within the Judicial Council. A major victory for the USS Liberty Veterans Association -- tantamount
to a public relations disaster for the Zionists -- was hanging in the balance! Such a victory on a very long campaign
to establish historic truth and the proper administration of justice would certainly result in loss of support for the Zionists
in the USA as more and more Americans became aware of their abysmal behavior toward the USS Liberty survivors, their families
and friends. It is in this context that one
must consider the strange press conference on 24 July 2001 in which Governor of New York State George Pataki announced Larry
Silverstein's 99 year lease on the World Trade Center. I say "strange" not just because there was the
appearance of schmoozing cronyism, but because the World Trade Center was considered a "White Elephant" with
regulatory and ordinance problems galore! Why take on such long term commitments requiring very expensive undertakings
such as asbestos removal? Well, the head of the Port Authority
who handed Silverstein the keys to the WTC just happens to be an ardent Zionist and prominent official of the Republican party.
Lewis Eisenberg was very likely already aware of what Secretary of the Treasury Paul O'Neill would later reveal in January 2004; namely, that President George W. Bush at his very first cabinet meeting in early February
2001 declared his intention to invade and occupy Iraq and demanded that a way be found to do this! And so the main objective of creating
a pretext for putting American muscle on Mesopotamian patrol was realized on 9/11. And of course Lucky Larry Silverstein, another
avid Zionist, made vast returns on his initial terrorism insurance premiums 49 days later on 9/11! The
text box below is clickable and will take you to the 24 July 2001 press release on the Port Authority website.  In the meantime, I took a little excursion out of the power center of New York City to Washington
DC where I attended a small gathering at the Army Navy Club as the guest of former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral
Thomas H. Moorer (Requiescat in pace). The wide open skies of Washington make me feel I'm in the country. I picked a daisy
from a flower box on the way to the Army Navy Club , and upon my somewhat early arrival there I sat in a lounge and started to pluck each of the daisy's petals one by one.
For each petal plucked, I would alternately whisper, "The Judicial Council is taking my petition quite seriously"
and "The Judicial Council, like the Chief Judge, finds my complaint "frivolous" and they are all having a good
laugh!" Nearly a full month had gone by
with no response to my petition for review of the Chief Judge's decision. Completely unaware of the 49 day countdown
from Silverstein's lease of the World Trade Center to 9/11, I reported on my trip to Washington and the Army Navy Club
to the Judicial Council because the proceedings there had, as shown below in the next three pages, direct bearing on the matter
currently before the judges. For easier to read copies of next two pages, click here. Because this correspondence became part of the
case file, I am sure that Judge Cristol was apprised of it. Around this time there was yet another countdown of which
I was unaware; namely, a countdown toward the convening of the next Judicial Conference called for by Chief Justice Rehnquist.
The Judicial Conference was set to meet on 9/11!
Footnote: Soon after Brassey's Inc.published Cristol's book The Liberty Incident in 2002 (based on his 1997 dissertation of the same title), Captain Ward Boston, who had
been the legal counsel of the US Navy Court of Inquiry into the USS Liberty incident, formally repudiated the Navy Court of
Inquiry's falsified findings and politically driven conclusions as well as Judge Cristol and his book.  I dare to say that, like most Americans, all the chief judges of the 11th Circuit Judicial Council,
listed below on the next three pages, lack Talmud awareness. The Talmud, unlike the Torah, elevates Jews above non-Jews
and permits certain liberties that we Americans would deem criminal. Of special concern to judges should be the Talmudic
Law of the Moser, whereby a Jew is prohibited from informing on another Jew to a non-Jew, directly or indirectly. This
very real practice, not unlike the Mafioso Code of Omerta, is diametrically opposed to our legal system, and should also be
of concern to our intelligence and law enforcement communities. The Talmudic Law of the Moser is essentially a conspiracy
of silence conducive to obstruction of justice. One cannot fully understand 9/11 or the USS Liberty incident without
taking the Talmudic Law of the Moser into account. Click http://www.show-the-house.com/id10.html to learn more about the Talmudic Law of the Moser. Also, anyone on the Internet can audit Talmud 101 at this very excellent
website http://www.come-and-hear.com. This should be a mandatory exercise for judicial, law enforcement and intelligence officers.
   Then came 9/11! Again, at the time, I had no idea the Judicial Conference was meeting that
very day! Judicial Fellow and University of Calgary Professor of Law Peter Bowal gives
a very interesting eyewitness account of what transpired that morning at the Judicial Conference. Click http://www.show-the-house.com/id61.html. The text box below is clickable and will take you directly to the US Courts website
where you can read about the Judicial Conference Proceedings the very day the towers fell. On page 48 you will
see that the Committee on Judicial Conduct matters had been very busy over the past few months! Though I never received
notification that my case file was referred to the Judicial Conference, one can surmise that the judges were aware of it.
Nearly four months after 9/11 (six full months after filing my petition) the decision of the Judicial
Council upholding the Chief Judge's dismissal of my original complaint as "frivolous" finally came on 7 January
2002. (See next two pages.)
Entertaining such
frivolity for so very long must have generated such laughter that the vibrations culminating on 11 September 2001 -- perhaps
at the Judicial Conference that convened that very day -- brought the towers down! Unless, of course, you prefer to believe eyewitness, photographic, audio, seismic and material
evidence of explosions as the real, purely scientific cause as demonstrated by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth at
http://www.ae911truth.org. Such explosives could only have been planted under the nose of the new landlord of seven weeks, Larry Silverstein,
and not by a man in a tent or cave in Afghanistan! As
these court documents show, precisely when the Zionists were facing the very real threat of exposure of their shameful deceitfulness
with respect to the USS Liberty incident, they quite suddenly turned the tables and realized a coup that soon put American
muscle on Mesopotamian patrol, which had long been their goal. The Zionists had the motive, means and opportunity to pull
off 9/11 and blame the attacks on the Arabs. Instead of being put under proper scrutiny, they have led the investigations
and judicial proceedings! At this point, I figured that a reasonable, last resort option would be to secure my case file
for donation to an institution of higher learning, where scholars could make their own independent judgments in a much larger,
historical context. Click here for easier to read copy of the next page. I sent a copy of my request for permission to donate my case file to Judge Cristol at his home
address, which he had given me back in 1991 when we met in Washington, DC, at a reunion of the USS Liberty Veterans Association.
The magic of those moments when we sat together at a banquet and schmoozed in the hotel lobby and conference rooms now lost,
the letter was returned with no reason given. There are only scrawled initials which I cannot read. It soon became apparent that at least one party was open to my idea. I admired the court's
cautious approach in this matter. (See next five pages.)
Click
here for easier to read copies of the following four page reply to the court's request for an inventory of documents to be
donated. Around this time I had a fortune cookie that read, "You have great attention to detail."
(See next four pages.)
So too did the court have great
attention to detail! (See next five pages and click here for easier to read copy of follow-up letter to edit court's summary of inventory of documents to be donated.)
     Finally, the Court punted. I gather that there was no agreement between Chief Judge Anderson
and Judge Cristol over my wanting to bestow my case file on an institution of higher learning. It appears to me that
the Court was determined not to deny my wish for more light on the subject. In further retrospect, I wonder what battles
were fought under the pretext of national security in the spring and summer of 2002, and did they have anything to do with
the inexplicable summary termination of Judicial Fellow Peter Bowal's fellowship at the US Supreme Court and his Professorship
at the University of Calgary? Was he collateral damage in the fight for truth and justice with respect to the USS Liberty
and the Zionists' illegal occupation of the Golan Heights? Click http://www.show-the-house.com/id62.html.  Six months later, in October 2002, I obtained my very first laptop computer and was on the Internet
regularly. (It so happens that my boss who supposedly perished on United Flight 93 had encouraged me in my query about
taking out a loan, which I subsequently did, to purchase the laptop.) I quickly found out that Herbert Hoover actively
advocated ethnic cleansing of Palestine to make room for the Zionists and therefore decided that I did not want to donate
my case file to an institution named after him. I also communicated my concern that the USS Liberty Veterans Association
would have an archive in an institution so linked with illegal Zionist objectives. I suggested that the Kennedy School
of Government would be more apt to generate scholarly activity in support of their noble quest for the establishment of historical
truth and the proper administration of justice. (See http://www.gtr5.com.)
|
