This page was discovered to have been hacked on 17 July 2009, with all contents
save the title above entirely removed. The link below at the Jeff Rense website gives a true copy.
Stephen M. St. John
19 July 2009
A Dissenting Critique Of The
9/11 Commission Report
With Alternative Recommendations
for Positive Change
Stephen M. St. John
A Citizen Of The USA
- YES, I AM FROM
THE COLONIES AND THEREFORE NOT YOUR CONSTITUENT. NEVERTHELESS, IT BEHOOVES YOU TO READ MY CRITIQUE BECAUSE ALL THE LIES
ABOUT WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION IN IRAQ ARE BUT LITTLE ONES WHEN COMPARED WITH THE BIG LIE ABOUT WHAT SUPPOSEDLY HAPPENED
ON 11 SEPTEMBER 2001. YOU NEED TO CONFRONT OUR MASTERS OF DECEIT LEST THEY REMAIN THE MASTERS OF YOUR DESTINY. - Stephen
M. St. John
Within hours of the 11 September 2001 crash of United Airlines Flight 93 near
Shanksville, Pennsylvania, debris that had rained down from the sky over a wide area extending for miles from the main impact
site gave best evidence of a shootdown. Within days of the crash, reporters from several established regional newspapers
had confirmed from many eyewitnesses the true extent of the debris field and even observations at the time of the crash of
a small, white, highly maneuverable military type jet in the immediate area, all of which were filtered out of nationwide
news broadcasts. These testimonies were essentially buried. They remain buried. The 9/11 Commission Report simply ignores
them in the very worst tradition of The Warren Commission Report on the 22 November 1963 assassination of JFK. One may call
both reports terminally under revisionist deconstruction (TURD); the Warren Commission Report is TURD1 and the 9/11 Commission
Report is TURD2.
For nearly three full years prior to the release
of The 9/11 Commission Report the fourth estate remained strangely silent about the lack of video surveillance evidence
at the major high- security ("Category X") international airports from which the ill-fated flights departed on
11 September 2001. Journalists were content with repeated television broadcasts of two Arab men passing through a security
checkpoint at Portland Maine International Airport for a flight to Boston earlier that morning. The same dumb silence of
the news media persisted after the recent release of video surveillance tapes showing the alleged hijackers passing through
a security checkpoint at Washington Dulles International Airport. The public broadcast of this Dulles Airport tape was nothing
other than a media event timed to precede by 24 hours the official release of The 9/11 Commission Report. Yet few have noticed
that this tape, which was provided to the Associated Press by the South Carolina law firm Motley Rice LLC, lacks a time
stamp, which fact alone raises doubts about its authenticity. An Australian researcher claims that the pattern of sunlight
and shadow in the background just outside the terminal door indicates mid-day rather than early morning. Moreover, the camera
selects from other passersby two young Arab men, then follows them and zooms in on them, which indicates human agency and
motive going beyond the normal operational parameters of airport video cameras. How can this be explained? Why is a private
law firm the custodian of such evidence properly belonging to a government investigation? (In
August 2009 I came to a different conclusion about the purported Dulles Airport video surveillance evidence, which you can
read at http://www.show-the-house.com/id92.html.)
What a weak chain of custody of evidence with respect to all
the airport video surveillance tapes for the morning of 11 September 2001! At this rate perhaps we can expect the Halliburton
Corporation to give us the Newark Liberty International Airport 9/11 tapes in 2007 and Anderson, Arthur, Bush & Enron
AOC (an alphabetical order corporation) to hand over the Boston Logan International Airport 9/11 tapes in 2010! Who knows?
Maybe in 2020 Taliban leaders will appear in Rockefeller Center on NBC TV's Saturday Night Live and repeat their quite reasonable
offer of October 2001 in the opening skit: "Show us the evidence and we'll give you Osama Bin Laden!"
Debris fields do not tell lies. Withheld video surveillance tapes speak volumes. The 9/11
Commissioners should hang their heads in shame! They have performed very well for their masters who have brought our great
nation into an unjustified, immoral, illegal and ill-advised invasion and occupation of two non-belligerent member states
of the United Nations and in so doing have blackened the reputation of the USA. In "connecting the dots" in the
chain of events leading up to 9/11 and recommending ways and means to prevent such an occurrence from happening again, the
9/11 Commissioners have failed to tell us what actually happened that day. They merely added details to the news accounts
of the day. All the elements of national sovereignty being brought to bear on their "war against terrorism" are
compromised by their lack of credibility and integrity.
The name Paul O'Neill
does not appear anywhere in the body of The 9/11 Commission Report; whereas the name Khalid Sheikh Mohammad appears so many
times it was abbreviated to KSM to reduce the length of the report by a few pages. KSM's revelations, like much else in the
report, are mostly hearsay and were probably induced by twists and turns and naked games under the direction of Major General
Geoffrey Miller, the overseer of interrogations in Guantanamo, Cuba and Abu Ghraib, Iraq. Or, like Emad Salem, who, up to
a certain point, helped to conduct an FBI sting operation that went awry and resulted in the February 1993 bombing of the
World Trade Center, was KSM a U.S. Government-paid facilitator? Why are the 9/11 Commissioners so reliant on KSM in their
report when the U.S. Government refuses to allow his free and open testimony in a courtroom in Germany in the trial of Mounir
al Motassadeq? On the other hand, former Secretary of the Treasury Paul O'Neill gives an incisive insider's account of the
thinking and motivation of President George W. Bush and his close advisors which is very relevant to the 9/11 investigation.
Paul O'Neill revealed to the public in January 2004 that, commencing at his first National
Security Council meeting held on 1 February 2001, just twelve days after his inauguration as 43rd President of the USA,
George W. Bush clearly and repeatedly indicated his fixation on taking over Iraq. O'Neill's insider's account shows that
George W. Bush deceived his fellow citizens with respect to his position on Iraq and the Middle East during his 2000 presidential
campaign, which fact does not recommend him for reelection in November 2004. Beyond that, O'Neill's testimony is, inter alia,
strong prima facie evidence of war crimes.
Bush's Iraqi obsession
predated the 11 September 2001 attacks by at least eight months and probably for a year or more. Desperate countermeasures
to O'Neill's damaging testimony came later in 2004 in the form of Bob Woodward's book, Plan of Attack, and Michael Moore's
movie, Fahrenheit 9/11; both would have you believe that the decision-making process for the unprovoked and unjustified
invasion of Iraq was entirely a reaction to the 9/11 attacks. However, in addition to O'Neill's testimony, premeditation
in the thinking of George W. Bush and his close advisors is reflected in Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategy, Forces
and Resources for a New Century, a document published in September 2000 by the Zionist-Neo-Conservative oriented Project
for the New American Century (PNAC), which, on page 51, states: "Further, the process of transformation, even if it
brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl
Harbor." Within months of this publication urging steps toward global military domination, most of the Zionist Neo-Conservatives
who signed onto this psychopathic utterance held key posts in the new Bush Administration as the countdown to the "New
Pearl Harbor" of 9/11 continued. The 9/11 Commissioners did not examine these circumstances at all.
From the southwest corner office of the 37th floor of a building four tenths of a mile NNE from the World Trade
Center I saw the twin towers burning about ten minutes after the south tower was hit. A colleague who earlier had been standing
at the window of an adjoining conference room saw the second jet as it approached the south tower from a distance much further
out than is commonly seen on videotapes shown on TV. He told me with great emphasis how at first glance the jet's port wing
was pointing almost straight down to the ground while the starboard wing pointed almost straight up. As the jet homed in
on the south tower it leveled its wings horizontally just before impact. Thus the jet was in a sharp turn as it was aimed
at the south tower in the final moments of flight. It was traveling at a very high speed normally reserved for cruising
altitude. What all this means is that the gravitational pull inside the cockpit was such that lifting one's hand, let alone
flying the jet, would have required prodigious effort on the part of the pilot - even an experienced pilot. How is it, then,
that a novice hijacker-pilot could pull off this stupendous feat of daredevil aerial acrobatics when his experience at flying
big jets was limited to routine training on flight simulators? Beginner's luck? Hardly. A more realistic explanation is
that the plane was flown by remote control in its unerring high speed arcing path to destruction. The very same circumstances
apply to the craft that hit the Pentagon. Again, the 9/11 commissioners did not delve into these circumstances at all, but
kept to dubious newspaper accounts.
Harking back to the Zionist-Neo-Conservative
principals of the PNAC, I note that one of them, Rabbi Dov Zakheim, was the Chairman of the International Division of System
Planning Corporation (SPC), which designs, manufactures and distributes highly sophisticated technologies for remote control
of aerial vehicles. Rabbi Zakheim left his position at SPC in early 2001 when President George W. Bush appointed him Under
Secretary of Defense and Chief Financial Officer at the Pentagon. Thus, as Comptroller, Rabbi Zakheim had command of the
Department of Defense's labyrinthine, bottomless accounts for six full months before the attacks of 11 September 2001. As
a Zionist, Rabbi Zakheim had an interest in putting American muscle on Mesopotamian patrol. As signatory to a document including
a psycho suggestion that "a new Pearl Harbor" would quicken Zionist-Neo-Conservative designs for global military
dominance, Rabbi Zakheim had a motive to bring these plans to fruition by finding or even creating such a pretext for war.
As a former corporate executive with a background in technologies for remote control of aerial vehicles, Rabbi Zakheim had
a way - remote control of aircraft - to create "a New Pearl Harbor" which would launch the USA into invasion and
occupation under false pretext. Again, the 9/11 Commissioners failed to take these circumstances into account and to weigh
and consider them.
Such a "false flag" intelligence
operation, in which the perpetrators artfully place the blame for their criminal act on their enemy, would surely have enough
ready, able and willing facilitators in the Command/Control/Communications structures of the military, where Zionist-Neo-Conservatives
have very great influence. Moreover, James Bamford, in his book Body of Secrets, gives a precedent for such outrageous, psychopathic
criminality. "Operation Northwoods" called for the killing of fellow citizens of the USA in a false flag intelligence
operation so as to create a pretext for the invasion of Cuba and restoration of Meyer Lansky's casinos under the guise of
retaliation. Approved unanimously by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, their "Operation Northwoods" was immediately rejected
by JFK. But this disturbing groupthink in the highest levels of the military and intelligence communities apparently persists
along with drugs, tattooed profanity as well as anti-Arab and anti-Moslem sentiment. The 9/11 Commissioners, having not learned
from history, did not even look here, even though the elements of motive, means and opportunity clearly converged between
the ears of Rabbi Dov Zakheim.
Another Zionist-Neo-Conservative, Philip Zelikow,
the Executive Director of the 9/11 Commission, apparently would rather have you believe that these Arab lads flew the planes
of 9/11 even though it is very highly doubtful that they had the ability to fly them the way they were flown that day. Little
surprise, then, that the 9/11 Commissioners paid no attention to Andreas Von Blow, former German Minister of Technology and
Research and State Secretary of the Ministry of Defense, who gives a very strong argument for remote control of the planes
of 9/11 in his best-selling book Die CIA und der 11 September: Internationaler Terror und die Rolle der Geheimdienste. Indeed,
a computer about the size of a small refrigerator can control as many as eight aircraft simultaneously, and can even take
over the controls of an aircraft already in flight. Such a computer can be deployed just about anywhere: in another aircraft,
in an office building, in a truck or van or boat. Furthermore, I myself have found that sabotage by remote control is the
most likely explanation for two other air disasters that also just happen to correlate with the national security interests
of the Zionist state: the crash of a U.S. Air Force EC-135N on 6 May 1981 and the 31 October 1999 crash of EgyptAir Flight
990. The loss of the EC-135N entailed loss of key training personnel in the AWACS program even as a debate raged on Capitol
Hill over the Reagan Administration's proposed arms package for Saudi Arabia which included, over vociferous Zionist objections,
five AWACS jets. When the EgyptAir Boeing 767 went down, so did a significant number of high ranking Egyptian military officers.
They had just been participating in U.S.-sponsored armaments programs which David Bar Ilan, the Communications Director of
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, called "a dire threat" to the Zionist state. Were these mysterious crashes
precursors of the remote controlled flights of 9/11? If these are wild and outrageous conspiracy theories, why didn't the
9/11 Commissioners take the bull by the horns and dispose of the matter? Why didn't Mr. Zelikow involve Rabbi Zakheim and
Herr Von Blow in the investigation?
Waleed Ash-Shehri, who, according to the 9/11
Commissioners, was a "muscle" hijacker aboard American Airlines Flight 11, was interviewed by the BBC on Sunday,
23 September 2001. He is a pilot with Saudi Arabian Airlines. He denied that he was the hijacker that the Zionist-oriented
Murdoch-Zuckerman-Sulzberger media empire said he was. He even somewhat audaciously denied to the BBC that he was dead! Several
other named hijackers came forward in the European and Arab press to deny involvement in the "terrorist attacks of
9/11." Why didn't the 9/11 Commissioners confirm or refute these published reports? Why did they take their cues so
subserviently from the Murdoch-Zuckerman-Sulzberger media empire? The 9/11 Commissioners failed to consider the interests
of the international community by limiting their true audience to President Bush, members of Congress, the military and intelligence
communities and club members of the military-industrial complex.
Huntleigh USA handled
security at Boston Logan International Airport where, as previously stated, there is a curious lack of video surveillance
documenting the hijackers boarding the jets of 9/11. Huntleigh USA is a subsidiary of a Dutch corporation, ICTS International,
whose board of directors just happens to consist of nationals of the Zionist state with the single exception of the comptroller,
a Dutchman. A "technical correction" added to the Homeland Security Act just before its passage into law renders
this foreign actor immune from lawsuits arising from the events of 9/11. Thus, these gatekeepers of 9/11 will never be put
under oath in a court of law to answer questions and present evidence about a breakdown in security that ultimately led
to invasion and occupation of Iraq. Is this not part of a pattern of obstruction of justice in combination with the 9/11
Carl Cameron of FOX News reported on "the
dancing Israelis" of Liberty State Park who, with apparent foreknowledge, were filming the attacks on the World Trade
Center and expressing jubilation over the event. Cameron's in depth reporting on this and other indications of a massive
Zionist espionage operation was removed from the FOX website but has been preserved by the Google sweeps of the Internet.
Again, the 9/11 Commissioners gave this serious matter no consideration whatsoever. Nor did they address the warning given
to New York employees of the Israeli messaging service Odigo two hours before the attacks on the World Trade Center a few
blocks away. That the Mossad is expert at forging passports and identities was out of the 9/11 Commissioners' scope; they
only had to consult with the governments of Argentina, Canada or New Zealand to confirm this very relevant fact.
Copious photographic evidence indicates that World Trade Center 1, 2 and 7 were brought down
by explosions within these buildings. Testimonies from personnel of the New York Fire Department tell of explosions inside
these buildings. Radio transcripts and written affidavits of members of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey Police
Department tell of explosions inside the twin towers including in the basement (www.thememoryhole.com/911/pa-transcripts/).
Recovery teams noted molten steel at the foundations of all three of these buildings. Steel girders there were still glowing
"cherry red" seven full weeks after 9/11 according to LiRo on-site engineering staff (www.liro.com/lironews.pdf).
Burning jet fuel and burning office paraphernalia cannot melt steel or even make it glow. Yet the 9/11 Commissioners conveniently
sidestep these crucial facts which support a conclusion of controlled demolition as the cause of the collapse of these buildings.
No wonder! Such a conclusion brings us further away from the bogeyman in a tent or cave in Afghanistan. A security lapse
occurred on the weekend before 9/11 when engineers had access to the World Trade Center during an unprecedented "power-down"
which is another strange circumstance ignored by the Commission.
The 9/11 Commissioners
rely on cell phone calls for evidence of what transpired aboard the jets of 9/11. However, cell phone calls are impossible
to make from a jet flying above 8,000 feet. Even from below this threshold they are impossible to make if the jet if flying
at or near 500 miles per hour. This is because the signal cannot adjust fast enough to connect with successive transmission
towers on the ground. Therefore, these fabrications must be totally rejected; when you rule out the impossible, you are that
much closer to the truth, no matter how unbelievable it may seem upon first consideration. The 9/11 Commissioners also depend
on air phone calls for evidence. While air phone calls are technically possible, such calls must be carefully scrutinized
in light of the fabricated cell phone calls. In addition, the previously mentioned technologies for remote control of aerial
vehicles are so highly sophisticated that control of an aircraft's communications system cannot be ruled out. Certain intelligence
agencies have been known to possess technology enabling a person's voice to be duplicated electronically for the purpose
In conclusion, I find that The 9/11 Commission
Report is so faulty and incomplete that it is impossible for me to put my trust in it. I believe that the 9/11 Commissioners
have, either wittingly or unwittingly, covered up a highly successful false flag intelligence operation designed to create
a pretext for invasion and occupation of Afghanistan and Iraq in fulfillment of the well-known Zionist-Neo-Conservative plan
to secure the Zionist state and to take the first step toward military dominance worldwide. The cardinal principle of the
9/11 Commissioners is to save President Bush embarrassment. The 9/11 Commission proved itself to be a mere adjunct to the
worst kind of propaganda put forth by the mainstream news media. As a countermeasure to this unfortunate development, I make
my own alternative recommendations for positive change.
1) My first recommendation comes in the form of a challenge
to President George W. Bush, former Texas Air National Guard part-time jet fighter pilot and to John Lehman, former U.S.
Navy jet fighter pilot and a 9/11 Commissioner: Let both of these men take the same routine training that the alleged 9/11
hijackers took on flight simulators for big commercial jets. Then have Bush and Lehman duplicate on their very first real
flight on a Boeing 767 and Boeing 757 the truly amazing precision flying evinced in the attacks on the South Tower of the
World Trade Center and the Pentagon. Let balloons be deployed to simulate these 9/11 targets. Then let us see if they, with
their professional aviation backgrounds, can hit these targets not straight on, but on a sharp, descending curve, as our
inexperienced Arab terrorist hijackers have been accused of doing. To make this exercise more fun, let the Defense Advanced
Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and The Economist magazine predict the outcome according to market fluctuations, particularly
on the options markets in advance of the Lehman Bush Boeing Transparency Challenge. Let Airbus award the Servo Flight Director
2) Let there be a complete, impartial and independent investigation
into what actually took place on 11 September 2001 rather than a long, tedious train of circumstantial evidence indicating
predisposition, activities and movements of suspects without consideration of other outside actors. Let this new investigation
take into account the Talmudic teaching that a Jew cannot inform on another Jew to a non-Jew, which is at variance with the
adversarial process of our legal system as well as an effective hindrance in uncovering Zionist intelligence operations designed
to put the Arabs in a bad light. Also, let this new investigation avoid altogether the word "reportedly" which
the 9/11 Commissioners used no less than 63 times. Loose use of language is conducive to imprecise thinking, which leads
to shaky conclusions. The lowest form of journalese does not belong in a report of such great importance.
3) Let there be a review of the FBI vis vis its treatment of eyewitnesses in the investigation of the TWA Flight
800 shootdown on 17 July 1996. Hundreds of eyewitnesses claimed they saw what they thought was a missile streaking up to
the Boeing 747 right before the explosions that brought the plane down south of Long Island, New York. One witness saw the
glow of the afterburner of this rocket from Norwalk, Connecticut, about 60 miles away, which rules out a mere shoulder-launched
rocket. But the observations of these many citizens were totally ignored in the final report on the incident. This abuse
of the citizenry of the USA has repeated itself with suppression of 11 September 2001 eyewitness accounts, including those
of another jet and a debris field extending for miles from the primary crash site of United Airlines Flight 93 as mentioned
above. Whoever was filtering out valid eyewitness accounts from day one shares to some degree the guilt of those who took
aim at the Twin Towers and the Pentagon and TWA Flight 800.
4) Let there be
a reopening of the investigation into the assassination of JFK, which would be apt for the times. Elected in 1960, by 1961
JFK was locked in a bitter behind-the-scenes struggle with the Zionist state's Prime Minister David Ben Gurion over the Zionist
state's nuclear weapons program that had been started at Dimona in the Negev in 1956. This fact was brought to light more
than three decades later, in 1991, with the publication of Seymour Hersh's The Samson Option, in chapter 8, "A Presidential
Struggle." JFK wanted to end the Zionist state's nuclear weapons program because he foresaw that such a program would
only result in an arms race for countervailing weapons of mass destruction in the region. This sound policy ended with his
assassination on 22 November 1963 according to the best wishes of James Jesus Angleton, who occupied the CIA's "Israel
desk" and was an afficionado of the Zionist state's nuclear weapons program. Angleton, who was also head of the CIA's
counterintelligence division, kept files on the falsely accused Lee Harvey Oswald long before the assassination took place,
according to researchers James DiEugenio and Lisa Pease in their book The Assassinations: Probe Magazine on JFK, MLK, RFK
and Malcolm X. Moreover, Federal Bureau of Investigation memos of FBI Director John Edgar Hoover (29 November 1963) and
of FBI Special Agent Graham W. Kitchel (22 November 1963) reveal the future President of the USA George Herbert Walker Bush
in Dallas on the day of the JFK assassination and helping to promote the misleading pro-Castro profile of the falsely accused
Lee Harvey Oswald so that the Warren Commission would feel compelled to lie to the world under the pretext that it was preventing
World War III with Castro's sponsor, the former Soviet Union. We have come full circle now with Bush's son using the same
office of President of the United States to wage unjustified war on the false pretext of removing Iraq's non-existent weapons
of mass destruction. Deeply rooted treason and corruption have prevented a just and truly comprehensive peace in the Middle
East including a region from the Nile to the Euphrates rivers free from weapons of mass destruction.
5) Let there be a lessons learned session for the 9/11 Commissioners who failed to include respect for international
law and treaty obligations in their enumeration of the elements of national power: diplomacy, intelligence, covert action,
economic measures, law enforcement, foreign aid, public diplomacy, military efforts and homeland security. Their focus is
on building a proverbial better mousetrap to catch terrorists so as to replace the one that quite mysteriously did not work
on 9/11. They do not have sufficient sense of introspection to ask themselves the question posed by the Platinum Corollary
of the Golden Rule: We know what they have done to us; what have we been doing to them?
Let the governments of the United States and New York State and New York City make Governors Island in New York Harbor available
to the United Nations for dual use as the formal headquarters of the Military Staff Committee and as a ready-made campus
for an International Military Academy where military professionals from around the world can meet to study and develop and
promulgate protocols and procedures in support of decisions taken by the Security Council which require international enforcement
action per Chapter 7 of the Charter of the United Nations. Such an arrangement, which can easily coexist with the Fort Jay
and Castle Williams national monuments, befits the rich history and military tradition of this national treasure symbolizing
the evolutionary growth and remarkable destiny of the United States. More importantly, such an arrangement will be a demonstration
of a renewed commitment by the United States to its most important treaty obligation ever undertaken and a sorely needed
way to formulate and coordinate the practice of peacekeeping and to distribute the burdens thereof among all the states members
of the United Nations. Let the USA lead as a sovereign equal among sovereign equals according to a solemn agreement among
the nations and not as a self-appointed constabulary force according to the schemes of the big spenders at the PNAC!
7) Let the Secretary General of the United Nations exercise Article 27.3 of the Charter of
the United Nations which requires a member of the Security Council to abstain from voting in the Security Council whenever
this body deliberates on disputes to which such member is a party. Such a measure would put an end to the abusive use of
the veto power long exercised by the United States to stall enforcement of Security Council Resolution 242, which is as
old as the erstwhile Twin Towers of the World Trade Center, having been adopted into law when the foundations for these buildings
were put in place. Likewise, such a measure will hinder the United States from exercising other Security Council resolutions
before the ink is dry or even before the document is ratified! The unremitting bias of the USA in favor of the Zionist state
has poisoned relations among states, which is a problem that needs correction. International law is the true shield of the
Palestinian people. Why deny them this shield?
8) Let the people
of the United States be reminded that the law of the land, The Constitution of the United States, provides in Article VI
that "all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law
of the Land." This includes our most important treaty which brought into existence the United Nations. We have solemnly
declared to abide by the Charter of the United Nations, which, in Article 25, states: "The Members of the United Nations
agree to accept and carry out the decisions of the Security Council in accordance with the present Charter." Therefore,
when Zionists lead the USA into circumventing Security Council Resolution 242 as they have consistently done for nearly four
decades, they are flouting not only the Charter of the United Nations but the Constitution of the United States as well!
Why does the President of the USA, upon taking office, take the following oath or affirmation: "I so solemnly affirm
that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve,
protect and defend the Constitution of the United States"? For what purpose? Make no mistake about it. The Zionists
are pulling on the very foundation for a just and lasting peace in the Middle East.
Let the term "anti-Semitism" be fully understood. Arabs and real Jews descend from Noah's son Shem from whose name
comes the derivative term "Semite." However, Ashkenazi Jews are the converted descendants of Khazars and are thus
mainly of Turkic extraction. Ashkenazi Jews descend from Japheth, Shem's brother, and therefore they are not Semites. Both
the Ashkenazi Jews and the real descended by blood Jews, the Sephardim, share genetic traits from a common ancestor, Noah,
but of the two only the Sephardim are Semites. And so it is quite ironic that these converted Khazar Jews coined the misleading
and manipulative term "anti-Semite" during their long sojourn in central and eastern Europe. This is not to dispute
the validity of the Khazar conversions to Judaism but rather to warn that the dire prophecies of Ezekiel apply to the Ashkenazi
Jews whom the prophet referred to as Gog, their prototype descended from Japheth. Moreover, Ezekiel foretold that a remnant
of one sixth of Gog would descend from the north onto the mountains of Israel, which came to pass after the Nazis nearly
exterminated this group. The heart of the problem today is that Christian Zionists, whose support is so crucial to the Zionist
state, confuse the prophesied arrival of Gog in Palestine with the prophesied return of both the House of Judah and the
House of Israel to this land. In short, the Ashkenazi Jews have usurped the name of Israel. Hence the Almighty's command
to the prophet Ezekiel: "Therefore, son of man, prophesy and say unto Gog, Thus saith the Lord God; In the day when
my people of Israel dwelleth safely, shalt thou not know it?" This is the great reality check. Know a tree by its fruit:
apartheid walls; psychological walls; ethnic cleansing; transferrals; collective punishments; unheard-of atrocities; out
and out repudiation of international law; corruption in high places; wishing the untermenschen would just go away; etc.
etc.. The United States has put its money on the wrong horse!
10) Let us recognize
the spiritual problem besetting the USA, whose foreign policy reflects the modus operandi of the Mafioso statesman Sam Giancana:
"Don't ever forget that I'm the 'Justice of the Peace.' If they do what I want, we'll take care of them. If they don't,
well, we'll take care of that too." To bribe foreign nationals is to pass the cup of treason, which is the polar opposite
of JFK's aim to "pass the torch of freedom." Winston Churchill's 1921 advice to "bribe the Arabs" -revealed
in Tom Segev's One Palestine, Complete - is a topping example of where corruption will lead in the long run. We are on the
same path right now in Iraq as George W. Bush follows in his hero's footsteps.
Let the people of the United States jettison its partyocracy and replace it with a true democracy that includes the option
to abstain in each and every category on the voting card. In this way, variables of abstentions will confound prognosticators
whose incestuous relationship with the voting process has been described in great detail in Votescam: The Stealing of America
by James and Kenneth Collier.
12) Stop the stultification of the American
people by reinvigorating the news media. Let the government create its own news media separate from the rest so it can generate
its own propaganda openly and not by stealth through the offices of highly paid yes-men posing as journalists. Thus far
the bright lights of our news media haven't even identified the need for an adequate explanation for the missing airport
video surveillance tapes of 9/11. This is but one example of systemic failure due to political control.
13) Pull all US and UK troops out of Iraq by the end of 2004 and substitute them within a three months transition
period with forces from Arab League member states under the direction of the United Nations, which will draw on a restitution
fund provided by the United States and the United Kingdom.
Copyright 2004 Stephen M. St. John All rights reserved. Private not-for-profit distribution
with proper attribution to author is permitted and encouraged. Stephen M. St. John, Post Office Box 449, New York, NY 10185
Tel/Fax: 212 534 5024 Sole Author of An Eight Part Peace Proposal for Greater Jerusalem E-Mail: firstname.lastname@example.org