Precursors of Remote-Controlled Flights of 9/11?
Stephen St John – May 5, 2006

6 May 2006 marks the 25th anniversary of the mysterious crash of a US Air Force EC-135N surveillance jet near Walkersville, Maryland, just a few miles north northeast of Frederick and about 50 miles north northwest of Washington, DC.

Within a few days of this crash, I heard a rumor within the financial community in Los Angeles that Zionists had sabotaged the jet in a display of Talmudic pique over the Reagan administration's proposed arms package for Saudi Arabia which included five AWACS jets.

You see, the EC-135N was really an AWACS jet, except that the satellite dish was housed in a protruding nose section rather than in the more familiar disk structure on top of the fuselage of an AWACS, as shown in the photos below.

When this EC-135N went down, a heated debate on the Saudi arms package was already in its third week. But very few in Congress could liken an EC-135N to an AWACS and those who knew these jets were virtually the same were not telling the public. Hysterical, outrageous statements echoed under the Capitol dome and on the airwaves and in the print media. This gem from ever-smiling Senator Joseph Biden is a good example: "Such jets in the hands of the Saudis would let them strip Israel's most secret defenses totally naked." Yeah! And I have a name brand for my line of swimwear: Push the Jews into the Sea!

Though Reagan prevailed with the Saudi arms package, the political trade-off, viewed in retrospect, has severely damaged the leadership role of the USA as a solemnly-pledged sovereign equal among sovereign equals at the United Nations. With the rise of yet another silly Stanford Soviet expert, the official position of the USA that Zionist settlements in occupied Arab territories were "illegal" morphed into an ambiguous, more Zionist-friendly catchphrase "obstacles to peace."

Dennis Ross continued under George H. W. Bush and then William Jefferson Clinton to undermine United Nations Security Council resolution 242 at the State Department. In so doing, Ross also undermined the Constitution of the United States, which holds that "all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land." For a citizen of the USA, disrespect for United Nations Security Council resolution 242 and the Charter of the United Nations is tantamount to disrespect for the Constitution of the USA!

The recent treatment of the Zionist lobby by professors Stephen Walt and John Mearsheimer barely scratches the surface when you consider this statement by former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the late Admiral Thomas H. Moorer, made on 24 August 1983: "I've never seen a president - I don't care who he is - stand up to them. It just boggles the mind. They always get what they want. The Israelis know what is going on all the time. I got to the point where I wasn't writing anything down. If the American people understood what a grip these people have got on our government, they would rise up in arms. Our citizens certainly don't have any idea what goes on."

When a veteran of the stature of Admiral Moorer says "rise up in arms" you have to know that he really smelled trouble!

Well, Reagan prevailed in his Saudi arms deal and a "Star of David" asterisk was put on our constitutionally-mandated treaty obligations and Reagan was reelected in 1984 by the greatest margin in the history of presidential elections. Thus the foundation for two more decades of strife in the Middle East had been laid. And the EC-135N crash quickly disappeared into the mists of history. Nobody ever really talked about it. My copy of the Air Force disaster report on the EC-135N, written by then-Brigadier General Robert E. Chapman, went into deep storage.

Perhaps because of my request for the US Air Force report on the EC-135N disaster, or perhaps because of my advocacy of the just cause of the survivors of the June 1967 Zionist attack on the USS Liberty, or perhaps because of both activities, I came under surveillance and grew more and more aware of the police state tactics employed by our Zionist buddies. This was 20 years before 9/11 and the subsequent erosion of our civil liberties.

News of the 31 October 1999 Egypt Air flight 990 crash at sea caused me to refresh my memory of the EC-135N crash, and within days after rereading General Chapman's report, I was faxing an article to the international community here in New York City in which I noted similarities in the two air disasters.

Both Boeing jets were flying on autopilot at cruising altitude when, without any warning whatsoever, they suddenly and mysteriously went into unrecoverable nose-dives that nearly reached the speed of sound. Both jets broke apart near the end of their long falls.

Unlike the Egypt Air 767, the EC-135N, a military version of the Boeing 707, had no black box. But examination of the fully recovered debris revealed the pitch trim setting in the full nose-down position. Moreover, investigators confirmed eyewitness reports of an unexplained explosion just after the jet broke through a 2000 feet cloud cover. They determined that this explosion took place inside the pressurized compartment of the fuselage. They also concluded that even if there had been no explosion, the EC-135N was already doomed in an unrecoverable plunge. Again, unlike the official story of the Egypt Air disaster, there were no allegations of suicide.

Perhaps the most intriguing of all the evidence pertaining to the demise of the EC-135N, as noted in the Chapman report, were the incomplete transponder beacon return signals recorded at the Leesburg, Virginia air traffic control center just seconds before the jet began its plunge. This, I pointed out in my fax broadcast, suggested electro-magnetic wave interference, or sabotage by remote control of the aircraft. I suggested that Egypt Air flight 990 may have met the same fate.

But the most significant evidence pertaining to the destruction of both jets addresses the question of motive. Who benefits? Both air disasters served the national security interests of the Zionist state. The destruction of the EC-135N was a shot across the bow to those who would even think to sell AWACS jets to Saudi Arabia. And the Egypt Air jet carried 33 high-ranking Egyptian military officers, many of them generals.

In my fax broadcast, I noted Egypt's heavy loss of military officers aboard Egypt Air flight 990. I further noted that many of them had just participated in US sponsored armaments programs here in the USA. Then I cited from the right wing Zionist weekly newspaper published in Brooklyn, New York, the Jewish Press, a statement by then-Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's Director of Communications, David Bar Ilan, that these US sponsored armaments programs for Egyptian military officers constituted a "dire threat to the state of Israel."

Within about 24 hours of my broadcast fax's arrival at the Israeli Mission to the UN, the New York City tabloids, so careful to have omitted Bar Ilan's crucial statement about the armaments programs being a dire threat in their sensationalist and lurid coverage of the Egypt Air disaster, reported that he had just had a heart attack. It was his first. A second one not long after proved fatal.

Sensing I had indeed hit a nerve, and that I was on the right track, I sent another fax broadcast on 31 January 2000. Noting my statements that the crashes of both jets, the US Air Force EC-135N and Egypt Air flight 990, not only touched on the national security interests of the Zionist state, but were also quite rare events in and of themselves, I was dismayed, but not surprised, to hear of the downing of an Alaska Airways jet off Point Mugu on the coast of California even as I was sending this repeat fax broadcast. In my imagination, I felt as though somebody was telling me: "We make the facts. Here is an example of a jet suddenly and unexpectedly having fatal problems with its pitch-trim setting, and there is absolutely no connection to the national security interests of the Zionist state. You need to amend your article that you are now faxing."  At the very least, this was a strange coincidence indeed!

Unlike the Egypt Air 767, the EC-135N did not have a voice recorder on board. The last radio communication from the pilot was routine. But not until the official story of 9/11 began to unravel did I begin to fathom the significance of the cockpit voices from Egypt Air 990. They were fake! These voices were the result of the technological wonder called digital voice morphing in which the sound of anybody's voice can be duplicated in real time.  If the full range of the subject's voice has been recorded, which usually can happen in a 10 minute phone conversation, and then fed into the computer software, anybody speaking the subject's language can very convincingly sound like the subject person on the phone to his or her family, friends, coworkers, etc. etc.. In practical terms, problems with voice morphing will arise when gaps in the impersonator's knowledge become apparent to his or her interlocutor.

Despite what Universal Studios will have you believe, the alleged phone calls from the flights of 9/11 were all fake too. They were all the "product" of voice morphing technology. Cockpit voice recorders do not pick up sound in the passenger cabin, unless of course you are watching a Zionist propaganda movie. But voice morphing technology can turn a cockpit in real life into a sound stage very much akin to what the people in Hollywood use. With the right access, budget, time and "work-up," your bowl of jelly beans can sound like a familiar voice from the past.

A Canadian professor of mathematics, Kee Dewdney, after conducting experiments that proved the utter impossibility of cell phone calls from airborne jets, gave a practical criticism of the transcripts of the alleged 9/11 cell and air phone conversations which is reminiscent of the great literary critic I. A. Richards. Dewdney found that the conspirators betray themselves with their own words and behaviors and left the overall impression that they would be poor candidates indeed for an opening for scriptwriter at the Aaron Spelling studios in Hollywood.

Families, friends, and colleagues of the 21 killed aboard the EC-135N on 6 May 1981 are holding a private reunion on the 25th anniversary of the crash later this week. A memorial was established at the National Museum of the Air Force in Fairborn, Ohio, and another one is planned for the crash site with the kind cooperation and support of the good folks of Walkersville, Maryland, among others.

In the best tradition of our military, these men and women are tightlipped about the missions that they have carried out in the interests of our national security. And, as the late Admiral Moorer once told me, the military is not a democracy, but rather an organization that supports a democracy. Hence, the responsibility lies with the citizens of this nation, if not their elected representatives, to probe in areas where people in the military are not accustomed to go when there are compelling reasons to do so.

I have been in e-mail contact with two family members of two of the victims aboard the ill-fated EC-135N and I know that they are wondering about the circumstances of the jet's crash. One of them made me aware of an explanation to the effect that the presence of authorized civilians aboard the jet caused a breakdown in military discipline, which resulted in the crash. Indeed, the wife of one of the pilots was in the left pilot's seat, and her husband occupied the right co-pilot's seat. This arrangement, part of a program whereby spouses of military personnel would periodically visit with them while on duty, certainly cannot explain anomalous transponder beacon signals, or a mysterious move from cruising on autopilot to full nose down attitude, or an unexplained explosion within the pressurized cabin of the fuselage.

It is finally time to admit that there has been a cover-up of the true circumstances of the downing of this US Air Force EC-135N and that there exists very strong prima facie evidence of a terrorist act of mass murder, which, in retrospect, appears to be part of a pattern of behavior associated with the national security interests of the Zionist state. This pattern of behavior reaches all the way to 9/11, which achieved the Zionist Neo-Conservative goal of putting American muscle on Mesopotamian patrol.

Americans need to suspend their games and other entertainments and engage themselves in a national day of reckoning about what really happened on 9/11. When Americans can see actors and actresses portraying the alleged hijackers and other passengers on United Airlines Flight 93, but cannot view them on any surveillance videotape from any of the "Category X" high security international airports from which the flights of 9/11 departed, one can only conclude that there is something radically wrong.  There is a Praxis of Evil in our midst.  A fungus among us.

The Scholars for 9/11 Truth and the Scientific Panel Investigating 9/11, among others, have proved beyond any reasonable doubt that the 9/11 Commission Report is part of a cover-up of what really happened on 9/11. Indeed, all the lies that we have been told about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq - and they were very big lies - are but little ones when compared with the BIG LIE about 9/11.

The 9/11 Commissioners ignored indications of remote control piloting of the jets of 9/11 brought forward by retired Army Colonel Donn de Grand Pre (among others), who had convened within days of 9/11 a meeting of military, commercial and civilian aviators and experts. Their conclusions, which De Grand Pre reported to the highest levels of the Pentagon, were that the jets of 9/11 could not possibly have been flown the way they were flown by Arab flight students and that the best explanation for these flights was that they were flown by remote control during the peak activities of
multiple NORAD drills.

The common thread linking the EC-135N disaster with the Egypt Air Flight 990 disaster and the attacks of 9/11 is the technology of remote control of aerial vehicles.  Chief among those comprising the small universe of people conversant with this technology is Rabbi Dov Zakheim, who left his post at System Planning Corporation after President George W. Bush appointed him Undersecretary of Defense and Comptroller of the Pentagon in the months leading up to 9/11. In September of 2000, exactly a year before 9/11 and two months before the presidential election that brought George W. Bush into the White House, Zakheim had signed a controversial paper, published by the Project for the New American Century, which suggested that "a new Pearl Harbor" type of event would greatly facilitate implementation of the recommendations in this paper.  Hence, it can be fairly said that the motive and the means and the opportunity to pull off an event like 9/11 converged between the ears of Rabbi Dov Zakheim.

There is an urgent need to reopen the investigations of the EC-135N disaster, the Egypt Air Flight 990 disaster and the attacks of 9/11.  These investigations must take into account the Talmudic law of the Moser, which, like the Mafioso code of omerta, prohibits a Jew from informing upon another Jew to a non-Jew, a practice that is not only diametrically opposed to the adversarial process of our legal and judicial systems, but also to the proper functioning of our intelligence and law enforcement communities.

Battle lines must be drawn.  This Praxis of Evil, or fungus among us, cannot be allowed to co-opt our public officials any more.  Already the party of Sodom and Gomorrah and Tel Aviv is hinting at a Hillary Clinton - John Murtha ticket for the up-coming presidential election in 2008.  Murtha's congressional district in Pennsylvania is where United Airlines Flight 93 left an 8 mile wide debris field after being shot down with two Sidewinder missiles.  It is apparent that Murtha is being rewarded for not challenging the absurd, official story of what happened to flight 93.

Murtha has made a pretense of challenging the 9/11 Commission Report with his "Able Danger" revelations.  But let it not be forgotten that no matter what the alleged hijackers said or did in the months and years leading up to 9/11, there is no proof that they were at any of the airports, let alone on the flights of 9/11.  (Again, where are the routine video surveillance tapes showing them there?)  Even Lee Harvey Oswald showed suspicious behavior well before Jack Ruby shot him on 24 November 1963 in Dallas.  And I don't mean running home to get his handgun after the JFK assassination.  While in Moscow even as JFK took the oath of office, Oswald was supposedly buying pick-up trucks for anti-Castro groups in New Orleans.  One suspects that if you were in the active files of both J. Edgar Hoover and James Jesus Angleton back in those days, you could be in two places at once in more ways than one!