|
 In the photo at right, taken from a video that
the US Government offered as an exhibit at the Zacharias Moussaoui trial, you see a 9/11 suspect allegedly at a Dulles Airport
security checkpoint at the lower left. A film editor framed the suspect in a box for demonstration purposes. But
I draw your attention to the pedestrian just outside the terminal at the extreme top left of the entrance. Note his
or her shadow and how it points directly toward the closed circuit television camera (CCTV) filming the alleged hijacker inside
the terminal. Note also the angle of the pedestrian's shadow in relation to the thick black stripe that
runs along the terminal floor from right below the CCTV and straight to the metal detector. Keep all this in mind
as you scroll down.  At right is a close-up of
the pedestrian outside the terminal. Again, note that his or her shadow points right at the CCTV camera filming the
alleged hijacker. For those in the "9/11 Truth Movement" who profess they cannot see the pedestrian's shadow
in this film, a series of edited photos appears at the end of this presentation. Also, a link to the video on the US
Courts website appears below, and by viewing it the reader will see that many other passersby were casting shadows in the
same direction that day. For those who conclude that the sun is anti-Semitic, I recommend a psychiatrist.
 Now, we turn to Google Earth
for a lesson in geography which will enable us to put the pedestrian's shadow in the right perspective. At left is
a photo of Washington Dulles International Airport from 36,000 feet. The two main runways are parallel and go north/south,
or, at headings of 10 degrees and 190 degrees. These headings are painted in white at the ends of the runways in aviation
shorthand 1L and 1R (one left and one right) for jets approaching from the south on a 10 degree heading and 19L and 19R (nineteen
left and nineteen right) for jets approaching from the north on a 190 degree heading. Note the airline terminals between
the two parallel runways.
 In a closer image at left,
from 13,000 feet, you have a better view of the airport terminals in between the parallel main runways. The north and
south faces of these terminals are perpendicular to the main parallel runways. As you are about to see, this is an important
consideration with regard to the pedestrian's shadow and its angle relative to the thick black stripe on the terminal floor.  Now let us make a quick study
of the Dulles Airport terminals. As you can see on the terminal map reprinted at right from the Metropolitan Washington
Airports Authority website, the flow of passengers for departing flights from Dulles is from north to south, and south
to north for those who have arrived from other airports. Please note that the terminal map is upside down, showing the
south at top and the north at bottom. For a better view of the terminal map, click here: http://www.metwashairports.com/dulles/flight_information_3/terminal_map. Please note that interior and exterior construction and renovation have been done since 9/11, but none of this changed
the approach from the north of ground passengers to their departing flights.
 So you see, in this view
of the Dulles Airport terminals from 4,770 feet in the photo at left, the Main Terminal at the center top is where ground
passengers arrive for departing flights. They enter the main terminal on the north side, and proceed by foot, moving
walkways, shuttle lounges or shuttle buses to their departure gates at the two mid-field terminals. Given Dulles Airport's position
relative to the ecliptic, where the sun in Cancer in July reaches the zenith at mid-day, and is low on the southern horizon
in Capricorn in January, and at various points in between throughout the year, we know that shadows are never cast by the
sun toward the north faces of the airport terminals at Dulles, but only away from them.  And so, one may conclude, subject
to verification in a proper judicial discovery process, that if the north face of the Main Terminal runs perpendicularly
to the two main parallel runways 1/19L and 1/19R, then the black stripe painted onto the terminal floor is exactly parallel
with the runways as it is also clearly perpendicular to the north face of the terminal. From this one may also conclude
that if indeed the passengers for departing flights enter the Main Terminal on its north side, then the shadow of the pedestrian
just outside the terminal entrance, which points directly at the CCTV giving us the image, is on a heading of approximately
170 or 180 degrees relative to the thick black stripe on a heading of 190 degrees. From all of this we may conclude that the shadow
is cast from a direction where the sun never shines relative to Washington Dulles International Airport. The sun would
have to be setting in the north or north northwest in order to cast the shadow seen in the CCTV image. Therefore, the
CCTV video is bogus in that it could not have been filmed at Dulles and must have been filmed elsewhere and then fraudulently
presented as having been filmed at Dulles Airport on the morning of 9/11. The terminal entrance where the alleged hijackers
entered had to have been facing east or southeast for the pedestrian's shadow to be true to the time and place of the event
purportedly shown in the video. To the best of my knowledge and belief, and subject to verification in a proper judicial
discovery process, there was no entrance facing east or southeast which the alleged hijackers could have used to enter the
Main Terminal at Dulles Airport on the morning of 11 September 2001. Given that there is no time indicator shown
in the video, and given the strong prima facie case that the video was not filmed
at Washington Dulles International Airport, one must consider the strong possibility that certain officials within the US
Department of Justice obstructed justice by a calculated presentation of fabricated evidence. Whatever the case, it
is perfectly clear that we have NEVER seen ANY credible video surveillance images of ANY of the passengers and alleged hijackers
at ANY of the three airports from which the flights of 9/11 are said to have departed. How can this be explained?
How could we have invaded Afghanistan and Iraq without even asking this question first?
Again,
these conclusions are tentative in that they are subject to verification in a proper judicial discovery process. I have
not had an opportunity to verify the presented data by direct inspection and interviews with airport authorities. This
remains to be done, perhaps under the aegis of a 9/11 International Independent Investigation Commission established and supported
by the United Nations. © Stephen M. St. John 2009 ***********************************************************************************************************************************
On
21 October 2009, after nearly two months of intermittent faxing and emailing Dulles Airport
Shadow casts Doubt on US Government's 9/11 conspiracy Theory, I made a personal visit to the New York Regional Office
of the Federal Bureau of Investigation at 26 Federal Plaza on Broadway at Duane Street in Manhattan, less than half a mile
from ground zero. There, according to procedure, I completed and deposited a handwritten notice that referred to this
article in particular and the need for a new and a real investigation of 9/11 in general. ***********************************************************************************************************************************
Emailed letter to Attorney General of the USA Eric Holder and Inspector General Glenn A. Fine, dated 26 October 2009:
Mr. Eric Holder, Attorney General of the USA
Mr. Glenn Fine Inspector General, US Department of Justice
Dear Mr. Attorney General and Mr. Inspector General,
I write to urge you to examine my discovery of a bogus Dulles
Airport video surveillance tape used to frame Arabs for the shock and awe crimes of 9/11, as set forth below in my article
entitled Dulles Airport Shadow casts Doubt on US Government's 9/11 conspiracy Theory. This strong evidence
of a major fraud perpetrated from within the ranks of the US Department of Justice is but one of many, many reasons to conduct
a new and a real investigation of 9/11, including the cover-up and the possibly underlying "shock and awe" doctrine.
I am at your service to conduct such an investigation. My contact information also follows. Very truly yours, Stephen M. St. John Post Office Box 449 Rockefeller Center New York,
New York 10185 212 534 5024 *******************************************************************************************************************
Follow-up
letter by email to the Attorney General and the Inspector General, dated 27 October 2009:
Eric Holder Attorney General of the USA Glenn Fine Inspector General of the US Department of
Justice et alii
Dear Mr. Attorney General and Mr. Inspector General,
In the spirit of Abraham Lincoln, who once said "It is true that you may fool all of
the people some of the time; you can even fool some of the people all of the time; but you can't fool all of the people all
of the time," I send this request for a response to yesterday's message, which follows: I write to urge you to examine my discovery of a bogus Dulles Airport video surveillance
tape used to frame Arabs for the shock and awe crimes of 9/11, as set forth below in my article entitled Dulles Airport
Shadow casts Doubt on US Government's 9/11 conspiracy Theory. This strong evidence of a major fraud perpetrated
from within the ranks of the US Department of Justice is but one of many, many reasons to conduct a new and a real investigation
of 9/11, including the cover-up and the possibly underlying "shock and awe" doctrine. I am at your service
to conduct such an investigation. My contact information also follows. I close with an old adage which George W. Bush famously botched:
Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me.
Very truly yours, Stephen M. St. John Post Office Box 449 Rockefeller
Center New York, New York 10185
212 534 5024 ***************************************************************************************************
Stephen M. St.
John
Post Office Box 449 New
York, NY 10185
Honorable Loretta Preska
United
States District Court, SDNY 500 Pearl Street, Room 12A
New
York, New York 10007-1312
31 December
2009 Dear Judge
Preska, I hereby
renew and reiterate my claim of an award for having exposed the frame-up and cover-up of 9/11, which claim I made in a fax
broadcast to you and the missions to the United Nations here in New York City on 4 December 2009.
As a federal judge you are obligated
to prevent fraud and force, and you can refer to my fax broadcast now published on my website at http://www.show-the-house.com/id8.html where you scroll to 4 December.
My
boss, Marian Britton, who was the Assistant New York Regional Director of the Census Bureau at 26 Federal Plaza, was on
United Airlines flight 93 on 9/11, and my misgivings about the official story of 9/11 began with the realization that airport
surveillance videos of her or of any of the other passengers or hijackers were not made available to anyone under any circumstances.
Another Census Bureau colleague witnessed
and described to me the bizarre approach of United flight 175 over New York harbor, which I later discovered could not have
been accomplished even by a top gun pilot, and therefore could only have been done by remote control.
Now I'm showing you that a purported
Dulles Airport video surveillance tape, used as evidence by the US Government, is as phony as Osama Bin Laden's videotaped
messages to the world. Please see http://www.show-the-house.com/id92.html. Please do
not join the conspiracy of silence! I'd very much like to meet with you to discuss what can and should be done.
Very truly yours,
Stephen
M. St. John *************************************************************************************************** The day after Zacharias Moussaoui lost his appeal, I sent the following email
to his court-appointed attorney, Justin Antonipillai, and a letter by regular mail to the Chief Judge of the 4th Circuit Court
of Appeals, William B. Traxler, Jr..
Justin S.
Antonipillai Dear Mr. Antonipillai,
I believe my investigation and analysis of the airport
video used in the original Zacharias Moussaoui trial shows fraud on the part of the US Government, and for that reason alone
the 2006 verdict should be overturned and a new trial ordered. There you will find the link to my
article, Dulles Airport Shadow casts Doubt on US Government's 9/11 Conspiracy Theory.
Inasmuch as a version of this video
was also used to promote the release of the 9/11 Commission Report on 22 July 2004, I believe my finding demands a new and
a real investigation of what really happened on 9/11. I believe Zacharias Moussaoui is just an unfortunate pawn on the Grand Chessboard.
With kind regards, Stephen M. St. John
Post Office Box 449 Rockefeller Center New York, New York 10185 **************************************************************************************************** Stephen
M. St. John
Post Office Box 449
Rockefeller Center
New York, New York 10185
5
January 2010
Chief Judge William B. Traxler, Jr.
United States Court of Appeals, 4th Circuit
1100
East Main Street
Richmond, Virginia 23219
Dear Judge Traxler,
Regarding
the case of Zacharias Moussaoui, I have discovered in the course of my own independent research that the purported Dulles
Airport video surveillance tape, which our government presented as evidence in the original trial, is a fraud. Basic
astronomy and geometry prove my point. And so I urge you to read my article, Dulles Airport Shadow casts Doubt on US
Government's 9/11 Conspiracy Theory, on my website at http://www.show-the-house.com/id92.html.
I became more than curious on this subject upon realization that there were no airport video surveillance images
of any of the passengers or hijackers at Newark's Liberty International Airport and Boston's Logan International Airport on
the morning of 11 September 2001. My boss, Marion Britton, the Assistant New York Regional Director of the Bureau of
the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce, was on United Airlines flight 93 out of Newark. I know I never saw Marion again.
Beyond that, most of what I've heard and read on 9/11 I find unbelievable.
You are bound by your oath of
office to prevent fraud and force in our courts. Therefore, I appeal to your conscience and ask you to take the initiative
to verify my findings regarding the purported Dulles Airport video tape, and then take appropriate action based on this new
information.
Very truly yours,
Stephen M. St. John
http://www.show-the-house.com/id97.html ****************************************************************************************************** Edited
Photo Gallery Pedestrian in background gives away
the game, and exposes the praxis of evil in our midst.
Below is a close-up of the pedestrian casting shadow.
Aerial photo below from Google Earth gives north/south orientation from runway
headings, with north at top, south at bottom, east at right and west at left.
In next two photos below, the north/south faces of terminal structures are
shown to be perpendicular to the main runways, and the direction of arrivals of ground passengers for departing flights
is clearly shown to be from the north side of the main terminal.
Below is a closer view of the main terminal to the north and the two mid-field
terminals south of it. Passengers enter all three of these terminals from the north side.
 In the next two photos, the thick black stripe running on the ground from
the door to the camera is parallel to the main runways if this photo is indeed from an authentic Dulles Airport video surveillance
camera. It would then follow that the yellow line is very nearly on an exact north to south heading of 180 degrees from
outside the entrance to the camera inside. And this is the direction of the shadow cast by the passerby. The only
problem is, the sun does not cast its shadow from north to south. Therefore, this video is bogus. It was filmed
elsewhere and then fraudulently presented as having been filmed at Dulles Airport by agents of the US Government and perhaps
others in order to frame the Arabs for 9/11. This deception could not have been accidental. This fraud could only
have been perpetrated with foreknowledge of 9/11.
 The sun is a reliable witness, and basic astronomy and geometry give the proof.
This presentation ought to be the starting point for a new and real investigation of 1) the shock & awe doctrine; 2) the
events of 9/11; and 3) the cover-up of 9/11. Let the truth be told, and let justice be done!
Somewhere along the chain of custody of evidence for this video surveillance
tape (exhibit NT00211 at the 2006 Zacharias Moussaoui trial) is the link to the treasonous praxis of evil in our midst!
By what authority did the South Carolina law firm Motley Rice LLC make a version of this tape available to CNN to promote
the release of the 9/11 Commission Report the next day, 22 July 2004? And by the way -- not to change the subject --
I'd like to know the whereabouts of Admiral Michael Mullen on 9/11! ©
Stephen M. St. John 2009
|
